Make vs Zapier: is the app catalog worth the price?

Make gives you more automation per dollar: $9 a month buys 10,000 operations, while Zapier’s Professional plan starts at $19.99 and bills every step of every Zap as a task. Zapier’s case is the catalog and the polish: 7,000+ apps and the gentlest learning curve in the category.

Data checked:

TL;DR verdict

Make for value and complex flows: routers, iterators and 10,000 operations for $9. Zapier when your exact app pairing exists only in its catalog, or when non-technical staff must build automations unassisted.

Verdict card: Make vs Zapier. Make $9 a month for 10,000 operations against Zapier from $19.99 a month with per-task billing.
MakeZapier
Entry paid plan$9/mo (Core)From $19.99/mo (Professional)
What it includes10,000 credits (1 credit ≈ 1 module operation)Task allowance by tier; every action step is one task
Free plan1,000 credits/mo, 2 active scenarios100 tasks/mo, two-step Zaps only
Multi-step and logicRouters, iterators, aggregators on every paid planMulti-step from Professional up
App catalog2,000+ apps, plus an HTTP module for any API7,000+ apps, the largest catalog
Data locationEU (Czechia, Germany)US-centric cloud
Learning curveVisual canvas, moderateGentlest in the category
Strongest atComplex scenarios per dollarInstant setup and long-tail apps

Sources: Make pricing · Zapier pricing · data checked: Jul 18, 2026

Which we'd pick, scenario by scenario

Marketing team automating forms, ads and email

Make. These flows are multi-step by nature, and multi-step is exactly where Zapier’s per-task billing compounds fastest.

Solo founder gluing two niche SaaS tools

Zapier. If both apps sit in the catalog, the Zap exists in ten minutes, and at low volume the price gap is a coffee a month.

EU company with GDPR-sensitive flows

Make. EU data centers by default settle the processor-location conversation before it starts.

Our take

Zapier’s price reputation is outdated in one direction and accurate in another. The entry point dropped: Professional now starts at $19.99, not the $49 people still quote. What has not changed is the meter. Every step in a Zap is a billed task, so a 6-step flow on 500 leads burns 3,000 tasks a month, while the same flow on Make burns 3,000 credits from a 10,000 pool that costs $9. Zapier prices tasks so volume punishes you; Make prices operations so complexity is nearly free. That sentence is most of the comparison, and it is why Make is our default for SMB automation work. The exception we respect is the long tail: when a client runs a vertical SaaS nobody else integrates, Zapier is often the only platform with a native connector, and a native connector beats a week of HTTP-module reverse engineering. Before deciding on catalog size alone, run the three-way numbers in Make vs n8n vs Zapier.

← All Comparisons

FAQ

Frequently asked

Is Make cheaper than Zapier?

Per unit of work, clearly: $9 buys 10,000 Make operations, while Zapier starts at $19.99 and counts every step of every Zap as a task. At tiny volumes the gap barely matters; multi-step flows at volume are where Zapier invoices surprise people.

Does Make have fewer integrations than Zapier?

Yes: Make lists 2,000+ apps against Zapier’s 7,000+. In practice Make’s HTTP module and webhooks can talk to any API, which closes most gaps at the cost of some setup work.

Which is easier for a non-technical team?

Zapier, and it is not close. If nobody technical will ever touch the account, Zapier’s linear editor prevents more mistakes. Make’s canvas is more capable, and has more ways to get lost.

Related pages

Which process is costing you the most?

Book a free 30-minute audit. We map your biggest bottleneck, estimate the ROI of fixing it, and show you exactly how to fix it, whether you hire Dobify or not.

Book your free audit